![]() ![]() ![]() An essential part of the review process is differentiating good research from bad and leaning on the results of the better studies. A ‘methodological filter’ is the best method for identifying the best working style for a research question, and this method reduces the workload when surveying the literature. In a systematic review with a focused question, the research methods must be clearly described. ![]() ![]() There is a consensus that a review should be written in a systematic fashion, a notion that is usually followed. Good review methods are critical because they provide an unbiased point of view for the reader regarding the current literature. Although the idea of writing a review is attractive, it is important to spend time identifying the important questions. The main and fundamental purpose of writing a review is to create a readable synthesis of the best resources available in the literature for an important research question or a current area of research. Before asking ‘how,’ the question of ‘why’ is more important when starting to write a review. The value of a review is associated with what has been done, what has been found and how these findings are presented. When clinicians want to update their knowledge and generate guidelines about a topic, they frequently use reviews as a starting point. In the medical sciences, the importance of review articles is rising. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |